This article illuminates the growing potential of the DC rapid charging industry and the importance of effective business strategies in seeing a sustainable return on investment.
We will highlight the following four different investment strategies for entry into the DC rapid charging market in greater detail:
Direct Ownership
With this strategy, you purchase the DC charging units outright and are responsible for everything including the installation and (preventive) maintenance.
Leasing
By leasing DC charging equipment, you avoid high upfront costs and agree to a long-term leasing contract with a CPO or EMSP, paid in monthly or yearly instalments.
CaaS (Charging as a Service)
Charging as a Service (CaaS) is a subscription-based model in which you pay a CaaS provider a monthly fee in exchange for a DC rapid charging service that suits your needs.
Partnered Shareholding
This strategy shares a lot of similarities with direct ownership, with one major difference – ownership is shared among one or several additional parties, in lieu of a proportional share in revenue from the rapid charging site.
If you’ve noticed the explosive proliferation of electric vehicles (EVs) on the road in recent years, you’re not alone. The UK EV industry is enjoying a 22% year-on-year growth in sales, in tandem with the global shift toward a carbon-neutral economy.
Naturally, there is an accompanying need for investment in a dependably rapid charging solution – namely: DC, or Level 3, rapid charging stations. in the UK, the number of fast-charging points grew from 1,800 in 2016 to 8,600 in 2022 and is expected to grow further in the coming years.
As investment groups, entrepreneurs, and private businesses alike recognise the potential in e-mobility investment, the question arises: what are the challenges and advantages of investing in DC rapid charging, and where would you begin?
In essence, investment in DC rapid charging would be an investment on the ground floor of an industry set to continue growing exponentially over the coming years.
Nevertheless, the significant amount of start-up capital required to purchase, or invest in, DC charging stations does necessitate a comprehensive investment strategy to be viable.
This article discusses the pros and cons of DC rapid charging investment, before breaking down the four most common investment strategies – to help you decide which, if any, might be right for you.
Where a maximum power output of 50 kW impressed many early adopters only a few years ago, times have changed.
Today, Level 3 charging stations are able to deliver a lot higher maximum power outputs, some are even able to deliver up to 400kW of power allowing drivers to replenish up to 300km of range after just 15 minutes of charging.
Such a leap in charging times goes a long way to eliminating 'range anxiety’, one of the most significant inhibitors to purchasing an EV. And businesses that invest in rapid charging equipment can supply a service that’s in high demand in a quickly growing market.
Before we move onto those strategies, let us quickly weigh some of the overall pros and cons attached to a DC rapid charging investment and explain some important terms.
One last point of housekeeping before diving into the 4 key investment strategies for Level 3 charging. There are a few terms – CPO, EMSP, charge point owner – which could do to be explained, as these are the three most common roles an investor would take on, or engage with when entering the rapid charging market.
A charge point operator (CPO) could be a manufacturer or trader of charge points, in charge of the planning, installation, grid integration, and operation of the units you invest in. Additionally, they may also be responsible for hardware maintenance and software management.
An Electric Mobility Service Provider (EMSP) is a company set up to offer a wide range of EV support services, including the roles typically filled by a CPO. However, an EMSP would tend also to provide services to the end-user as well, such as payment and subscription services, and network solutions.
A charge point owner (rather than an operator) is the investor whose capital has procured the DC rapid charging stations and financed their installation on-site. Their responsibilities include ownership and oversight of the charging infrastructure, though they may well choose to outsource all practical management of the stations to a CPO or EMSP.
The most straightforward of the four main investment strategies (at least in terms of its definition) is direct ownership.
This refers to the process of purchasing DC charging units outright, purchasing or leasing the land for your charging infrastructure, planning installation and preparing the site, bankrolling installation of the units, and financing their upkeep.
You may, however, still elect to bring a CPO or EMSP on board to help you manage your rapid charging stations from a technical (though not financial) standpoint.
As an investment strategy, direct ownership requires the most start-up capital, yet results in an investment model with the greatest potential for long-term growth and ROI. Here’s a list of further advantages direct owner-investors may hope to enjoy:
On the other hand, direct ownership also comes with its fair share of investment challenges.
These risks can, understandably, be enough to make potential direct owners think again about their investment. Thankfully, however, mitigation of risk is possible. There exist a number of cost, branding, and revenue levers that you may employ to minimise the investment required and maximise your return. Here are a few examples:
As Linda Graves, CEO and Founder of EV Driver, made clear in one of our recent podcast episodes: direct ownership of a DC rapid charging station, let alone a site, would require “very deep pockets” and a variety of important aspects to consider.
We’ve already drilled this home, but it’s worth taking a last look at exactly what these costs would comprise:
As a direct owner, your responsibilities and the operational considerations you must make are considerably more taxing than as a part-owner, leaser, or when working with a CaaS provider. As the architect of your site, you will have to independently assess and decide upon factors such as site selection, software, permits and calibration laws, maintenance, and customer service.
Leasing offers a welcome alternative to direct ownership for those without “deep pockets.” It operates in a similar fashion to the leasing of an electric car: the investor avoids high upfront costs by agreeing to a long-term leasing contract with a CPO or EMSP, paid in monthly or yearly instalments.
The CPO/EMSP would then oversee assessing your site, your specific needs, and the requirements for charge point installation. They would then conduct the installation of your chosen DC charging units at no direct cost to the investor.
At the end of your leasing contract – typically 1-7 years – you may then have the option to take out a new lease or pay off outstanding costs to become a direct owner. As a DC rapid charge leaser, you may or may not – depending on your CPO and contract – be left in control of charger maintenance, operation, and customer support.
The most obvious and major benefit to the leasing model of DC rapid charging investment is the lack of massive up-front investment. Costs are instead parsed out over a period of several years, thus making DC charging accessible to a much wider and more diverse range of investors. Here’s a look at a few other key advantages of leasing:
Our penultimate investment strategy for DC rapid charging is, like leasing, also tailored toward investors without the capital required for direct ownership. Charging as a Service (CaaS) is a subscription-based model in which investors pay a CaaS provider a monthly fee in exchange for a DC rapid charging service that suits their needs. The CaaS provider would cover all the costs associated with establishing DC chargers in the investor’s chosen site.
CaaS is an investment strategy for investors looking to provide their customers, employees, or EV fleet with fast, comprehensive charging solutions on-demand. The investor would take no direct profit from the charging sessions, nor would the end-user have to pay to charge their EV at the CaaS station (unless the investor passed a portion of their subscription costs onto the user).
Instead, the major advantage of the CaaS investment strategy is that it delivers a hands-off, trouble-free means of passing on a highly desirable service to a demographic of your choosing. Here are some further examples:
Other advantages include:
For those to whom CaaS appeals, the only major downside is that the investor has no control over how the DC rapid charging points are operated or maintained; nor do they have a potential future stake in ownership.
Moreover, whilst the most affordable investment strategy at present, CaaS contracts are likely to remain costly, so care should be taken when weighing these against potential ROI.
Partnered shareholding, or the shared revenue model, is the final investment strategy on our list. It shares a lot of similarities with direct ownership, with one major difference – ownership is shared among one or several additional parties, in lieu of a proportional share in revenue from the rapid charging site.
For investors interested in the notion of direct ownership, but not keen to take on full fiscal and logistical responsibility for a DC charging project, partnered shareholding certainly has its advantages:
Drawbacks to the partnered shareholding investment strategy are not as obvious, though could include similar drawbacks to leasing or CaaS – as only one of several partners, you would forsake complete control over the architecture and management of your site in exchange for lowered costs.
Investment into the DC rapid charging sector of the e-mobility industry could produce significant ROI in the long term. Its possibilities for investors have even been likened to the gold rush era of the Wild West.
Nevertheless, there is no avoiding the fact that entrance into DC charging sector will always be costly. Coupled with a delayed ROI (until EV adoption surpasses a threshold that makes rapid charging more financially viable), it becomes evident that success as an investor will require a detailed investment strategy.
We hope readers will have come away with a firmer understanding of the investment opportunities open to them as potential backers of a young and promising market.
We’ve outlined the four most popular investment strategies for DC rapid charging in this article: direct ownership, leasing, CaaS, and partnered shareholding (AKA the shared revenue model). Deciding which works best for you will take time and careful consideration.
DC rapid charging investment strategies are the tip of the iceberg when it comes to understanding the dynamic e-mobility industry. To continue learning, and developing your position as a potential investor, explore a library of other useful articles on the EVBox blog such as the emerging calibration laws, the current state of the DC market, or how to make money with EV charging.
If you want to know more about our DC charging solutions, click here.